Posted on July 9, By Scott Youngren Despite the scientific and philosophical arguments for the existence of God presented on this website and elsewhere, some readers may still be haunted by a persistent question: If he is more than just an imaginary big-daddy-in-the-sky, why does it seem that God is hiding from us? It stands to reason that the inability of anyone to produce a unicorn is a pretty good reason not to believe in unicorns. Varghese comments in The Wonder of the World:
Robinson If you want to appear very profound and convince people to take you seriously, but have nothing of value to say, there is a tried and tested method. First, take some extremely obvious platitude or truism. Make sure it actually does contain some insight, though it can be rather vague.
Use highly technical language drawn from many different academic disciplines, so that no one person will ever have adequate training to fully evaluate your work. Construct elaborate theories with many parts.
Use italics liberally to indicate that you are using words in a highly specific and idiosyncratic sense. Never say anything too specific, and if you do, qualify it heavily so that you can always insist you meant the opposite.
Talk as much as possible and listen as little as possible. Follow these steps, and your success will be assured. It does help if you are male and Caucasian. Jordan Peterson appears very profound and has convinced many people to take him seriously. Yet he has almost nothing of value to say. This should be obvious to anyone who has spent even a few moments critically examining his writings and speeches, which are comically befuddled, pompous, and ignorant.
They are half nonsense, half banality. In a reasonable world, Peterson would be seen as the kind of tedious crackpot that one hopes not to get seated next to on a train. But we do not live in a reasonable world. His 12 Rules for Life is the 1 most-read book on Amazon, where it has a perfect 5-star rating.
And many critics of Peterson have been deeply unfair to his work, mocking it without reading it, or slinging pejoratives at him e. He believes that by studying myths, we can see values and frameworks shared across cultures, and can therefore understand the structures that guide us.
Peterson manages to spin it out over hundreds of pages, and expand it into an elaborate, unprovable, unfalsifiable, unintelligible theory that encompasses everything from the direction of history, to the meaning of life, to the nature of knowledge, to the structure of human decision-making, to the foundations of ethics.
A randomly selected passage will convey the flavor of the thing: Procedural knowledge, generated in the course of heroic behavior, is not organized and integrated within the group and the individual as a consequence of simple accumulation.
Under such circumstances intrapsychic or interpersonal conflict necessarily emerges. When such antagonism arises, moral revaluation becomes necessary. As a consequence of such revaluation, behavioral options are brutally rank-ordered, or, less frequently, entire moral systems are devastated, reorganized and replaced.
In the most basic case, an individual is rendered subject to an intolerable conflict, as a consequence of the perceived affective incompatibility of two or more apprehended outcomes of a given behavioral procedure. In the purely intrapsychic sphere, such conflict often emerges when attainment of what is desired presently necessarily interferes with attainment of what is desired or avoidance of what is feared in the future.
The individual, once capable of coherently integrating competing motivational demands in the private sphere, nonetheless remains destined for conflict with the other, in the course of the inevitable transformations of personal experience. This means that the person who has come to terms with him- or herself—at least in principle—is still subject to the affective dysregulation inevitably produced by interpersonal interaction.The table below presents an abbreviated geologic time scale, with times and events germane to this essay.
Please refer to a complete geologic time scale when this one seems inadequate. Tom died about , but of him came many sons, and one, Jack, who helped in the War of Of Jack and his wife, Violet, was born a mighty family, splendidly named: .
If you want to appear very profound and convince people to take you seriously, but have nothing of value to say, there is a tried and tested method.
Starve the beast essay Essay on a winter morning in kolkata essay changes? club ending essay with a quote english educational background essay my favourite personality holy prophet essay help al gore concession speech essay?
book references for a research paper.
starve the beast essay writing how to improve health care essay research paper on artificial intelligence zones salve deus rex judaeorum analysis essay Anavysos kouros descriptive essay Nature vs nurture debate essay in english what is a good thesis statement for a research paper zones essay writing starve the beast essay Anavysos .
Steps in writing a dissertation starve the beast essay help ieee research paper on voice recognition. Margin world essay praise song for my mother relationship analysis essays The merchant of venice essay Essay on useful microorganisms names is a thousand word essay long internet marketing paper people research, cornell engineering essay .